Diagnosing and Managing Unstable Angina

[FRONT COVER]

Unstable angina presentations

Initial Evaluation and Treatment

Initial Evaluation

Diagnosis of unstable angina depends on a careful clinical history, physical examination, and examination of a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Therefore, the initial evaluation of patients with symptoms consistent with ischemic pain usually should take place in a medical facility and not by telephone.

At the conclusion of this initial evaluation, the patient can be assigned to one of four diagnostic categories: not coronary artery disease, stable angina, acute myocardial infarction (MI), or unstable angina (Figure 1).

Initial Medical Treatment

The certainty of diagnosis, severity of symptoms, hemodynamic state, and medication history will determine the choice and timing of drugs used in individual patients. Drugs to be considered for use at the time of initial evaluation and treatment of patients with unstable angina include aspirin, heparin, nitrates, and beta blockers (Table 3).

Outpatient Care

Patients with unstable angina who are judged in the initial evaluation and treatment phase to be at low risk for adverse outcomes can, in many cases, be safely evaluated further as outpatients. Typically, these are patients who have experienced new onset or worsening symptoms that may be due to ischemia, but they have not had severe, prolonged, or rest episodes in the preceding 2 weeks.

Intensive Medical Management

Intensive medical treatment should begin immediately in the emergency department in patients at high or intermediate risk of death or non-fatal MI. For high-risk patients, such as those with ongoing angina at rest and/or those who appear unstable, simultaneous evaluation and treatment assume an urgency greater than for intermediate-risk patients, such as those with prior discomfort who are asymptomatic during the initial evaluation.

Recurrent symptoms after the initial hemodynamic goals of therapy have been achieved may be regarded as a failure of medical therapy and should prompt consideration of urgent cardiac catheterization. Although it is theoretically desirable to have the maximal medical regimen in place for >e;24 hours before declaring any patient a failure of medical therapy, to do so in all cases may be inappropriate or even dangerous.

Monitoring Medical Therapy

During the period of intensive medical therapy, appropriate monitoring includes:

Heparin

Beta blockers

Discontinuation of Intravenous Therapy

Reassessing Persistent Symptoms

Most patients stabilize and have improvement in their chest pain after 30 minutes of aggressive medical management and can be admitted to an intensive care unit or intermediate care unit. Failure to respond to initial therapy should prompt reconsideration of other possible catastrophic causes of chest pain including:

Treatment of Severe Ischemia Refractory to Aggressive Initial Therapy

Patients considered to have unstable angina after further evaluation and who fail to respond within 30 minutes to initial treatment are at increased risk for myocardial infarction or cardiac death. The major ischemic complications seen in unstable angina are recurrent unstable angina, acute ischemic pulmonary edema, new or worsening mitral regurgitation, cardiogenic shock, malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and advanced atrioventricular block. For these patients, in addition to maximizing the medical regimen described in the previous section and instituting appropriate adjunctive therapy (e.g., pulmonary artery pressure monitoring and inotropic therapy for shock, antiarrhythmic therapy for malignant ventricular arrhythmias, pacemaker for symptomatic high grade atrioventricular block), the clinician should consider insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump and cardiac catheterization.

If emergency cardiac catheterization is not possible, an intra-aortic balloon pump should be placed in unstable angina patients who have symptoms refractory to medical management and those who have symptoms in conjunction with hemodynamic instability. An intra-aortic balloon pump can also serve as a bridge to stabilize the patient on the way to the catheterization laboratory or operating room. Exceptions to this recommendation include patients with severe peripheral vascular disease, significant aortic insufficiency, or known severe aorto-iliac disease, including aortic aneurysm.

Selection of Further Therapy in Stabilized Patients

For patients who stabilize after initial treatment, this guideline proposes two alternative strategies for definitive treatment of unstable angina termed, "early invasive" and "early conservative."

Patients who prefer continued intensive medical management and patients who are not candidates for revascularization will continue to receive care at a level and duration dictated by the level of their disease activity.

Figure 3 describes the cardiac catheterization and myocardial revascularization phase.

Progression to Nonintensive Medical Therapy

Most patients with unstable angina stabilize and become pain-free with appropriate intensive medical management. Transfer from intensive to nonintensive medical management occurs when:

  1. The patient is hemodynamically stable (including no uncompensated congestive heart failure) for >e;24 hours.
  2. Ischemia has been successfully suppressed for >e;24 hours.

Once these criteria are reached:

Early invasive strategy:

All hospitalized patients with unstable angina and without contraindications receive cardiac catheterization within 48 hours of presentation.

Early conservative strategy:

Unless contraindicated, hospitalized patients with unstable angina receive a cardiac catheterization if they have one or more of the following high-risk indicators: prior revascularization; associated congestive heart failure or depressed left ventricular function (ejection fraction <0.50) by noninvasive study; malignant ventricular arrhythmia; persistent or recurrent pain/ischemia; and/or a functional study indicating high risk. All other patients receive medical management and undergo cardiac catheterization only when medical management fails.

Nonintensive Medical Management

Patients with unstable angina judged to be at moderate risk may be admitted initially to a monitored intermediate care unit until the diagnosis of myocardial infarction can be excluded and it is clear that the patient's symptoms are adequately controlled on medical therapy. These patients then enter the nonintensive phase of management.

Other moderate-risk and some low-risk patients may be admitted directly to a regular hospital bed with telemetry capabilities, thereby proceeding directly to the nonintensive phase. High-risk unstable angina patients will be moved to the nonintensive phase after 1 or more days of intensive management and stabilization.

Once patients reach the nonintensive phase of management, reasons for continued hospitalization include optimization of medical therapy, evaluation of the propensity for recurrent ischemia or ischemic complications, and risk stratification to determine the need for catheterization and revascularization.

Many patients reaching this phase will be referred within 1 to 2 days for either noninvasive functional testing or cardiac catheterization.

Recurrence of Pain and Return to Intensive Management

Noninvasive Testing

The goals of noninvasive testing in a recently stabilized patient with unstable angina are to estimate the subsequent prognosis, especially for the next 3 to 6 months, decide which additional tests and adjustments in therapy are required based on this prognosis, and provide the patient with the information and reassurances necessary to return to a lifestyle as full and productive as possible (Figure 2).

Choice of Test

An exercise treadmill is the most commonly used stress test and has the largest reported experience for use in patients with unstable angina. A nomogram useful to convert results from this test into an assessment of risk has been derived on a large sample of patients with coronary artery disease exclusively (not in patients presenting with unstable angina) (See the Clinical Practice Guideline, Unstable Angina: Diagnosis and Management). Use of this nomogram to quantitate risk from results of treadmill examinations provides more clinically useful information than a simple normal/abnormal reading.

Interpreting Noninvasive Test Results

Implications and appropriate followup for the exercise treadmill tests are outlined in Table 4.

Cardiac Catheterization and Myocardial Revascularization

Indications for Cardiac Catheterization

The goal of cardiac catheterization in patients with unstable angina is to provide detailed structural information necessary to assess prognosis and select an appropriate long-term management strategy. The procedure is usually helpful in choosing between medical therapy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients at significant risk for future cardiac events (Figure 3).

Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization include those managed under either the "early invasive" or "early conservative" strategies mentioned in the section on intensive medical management, patients undergoing emergency catheterization directly from the emergency room, and those who experienced recurrent ischemic episodes while being managed as outpatients.

Myocardial Revascularization

For some patients without these high-risk features, revascularization may still be an option depending on recurrent symptoms, test results, and patient preferences.

The health care team should educate the patient, his or her family, and advocate about the expected risks and benefits of revascularization and determine individual patient preferences and fears that may affect the selection of therapy.

Hospital Discharge and Postdischarge Care

The need for continued hospitalization of the patient with unstable angina is determined by whether the inpatient objectives of that hospital admission have been achieved. Patients who have undergone successful revascularization will usually have the remainder of their hospitalization defined by the standard protocol for the given procedure (e.g., 1 to 2 days for angioplasty, 5 to 7 days for coronary artery bypass graft surgery).

Patients opting medical treatment after a cardiac catheterization or functional study include both a low-risk group that can be rapidly discharged (e.g., 1 to 2 days after testing) and high-risk group unsuitable for or unwilling to have coronary revascularization. These patients may require a prolonged hospitalization to ensure adequate (or as adequate as possible) symptom control.

The goal during the hospital discharge phase is to prepare the patient for normal activities to the extent possible.

Patient Counseling

Discharge Medical Regimen

Following and Monitoring Symptoms

The natural history of unstable angina is typically characterized by either progression to nonfatal myocardial infarction or death, on the one hand, or resumption of the more quiescent clinical course of chronic stable angina/coronary artery disease, on the other. The acute phase of unstable angina is usually over within 4 to 6 weeks. The goal of postdischarge outpatient care is to make adjustments in the discharge regimen that appear most appropriate after an initial period away from direct patient care.

The long-term management of unstable angina ends as the patient reenters the stable phase of coronary artery disease.

Medical Record. Information to be recorded in the medical record summarizing initial evaluation and management for each patient includes:

After initial evaluation:

After outpatient management:

After intensive medical management:

After nonintensive medical management:

After noninvasive testing:

After cardiac catheterization and myocardial revascularization:

After hospital discharge:

At final outpatient visit:

Bibliography

Cairns JA, Gent M, Singer J et al.
Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, or both in unstable angina. Results of a Canadian multicenter trial. N Engl J Med 1985 Nov; 313(22): 1369-75.
Held PH, Yusuf S, Furberg C.
Calcium channel blockers in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina: an overview. Br Med J 1989 Nov; 299: 1187-92.
Hirsh J.
Heparin. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 565-74.
ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.
Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet 1988 Aug; 2(8607): 349-60.
Lee TH, Cook EF, Weisberg M et al.
Acute chest pain in the emergency room. Identification and examination of low-risk patients. Arch Intern Med 1985 Jan; 145(1): 65-9.
Lewis HDJ, Davis JW, Archibald DG et al.
Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med 1983 Aug; 309(7): 396-403.
Lubsen J, Tijssen JG.
Efficacy of nifedipine and metoprolol in the early treatment of unstable angina in the coronary care unit: findings from the Holland Interuniversity Nifedipine/metoprolol Trial (HINT). Am J Cardiol 1987 Jul; 60(2): 18A-25A.
Luchi RJ, Scott SM, Deupree RH.
Comparison of medical and surgical treatment for unstable angina pectoris. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med 1987 Apr; 316(16): 977-84.
Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM et al.
The continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease: initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation, in press. Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE et al.
Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1991 Sep; 325: 849-53.
McCormick JR, Schick ECJ, McCabe CH et al.
Determinants of operative mortality and long-term survival in patients with unstable angina. The CASS experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985 May; 89(5): 683-8.
Muller JE, Turi ZG, Pearle DL et al.
Nifedipine and conventional therapy for unstable angina pectoris: a randomized double-blind comparison. Circulation 1984 Apr; 69: 728-39.
Parisi AF, Folland ED, Hartigan P et al.
A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1992 Jan; 326(1): 10-6.
Parisi AF, Khuri S, Deupree RH et al.
Medical compared with surgical management of unstable angina. 5-year mortality and morbidity in the Veterans Administration Study. Circulation 1989 Nov; 80(5): 1176-89.
Pryor DB, Shaw L, McCants CB et al.
Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1993 Jan; 118: 81-90.
RISC Group.
Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. Lancet 1990 Oct; 336(8719): 827-30.
RITA Trial Participants.
Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet 1993 Mar; 341(8845): 573-80.
Rouan GW, Lee TH, Cook EF et al.
Clinical characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with initially normal or nonspecific electrocardiograms (A report from the multicenter chest pain study). Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 1087-92.
Russell RO, Moraski RE, Kouchoukos N et al.
Unstable angina pectoris: national cooperative study group to compare surgical and medical therapy. Am J Cardiol 1978 Nov; 42: 839-48.
Scott SM, Luchi RJ, Deupree RH.
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study for treatment of patients with unstable angina. Results in patients with abnormal left ventricular function. Circulation 1988 Sep; 78(3 Pt 2): I113-21.
Selker HP, Griffith JL, D'Agostino RB.
A tool for judging coronary care unit admission appropriateness, valid for both real-time and retrospective use. A time-sensitive predictive instrument (TIPI) for acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study. Med Care 1991; 29: 610-27.
Sharma GV, Deupree RH, Khuri SF et al.
Coronary bypass surgery improves survival in high-risk unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study with an 8-year follow-up. Veterans Administration Unstable Angina Cooperative Study Group. Circulation 1991 Nov; 84 (5 Suppl): III260-7.
Telford AM, Wilson C.
Trial of heparin versus atenolol in prevention of myocardial infarction in intermediate coronary syndrome. Lancet 1981 Jun; 1(8232): 1225-8.
Theroux P, Ouimet H, McCans J et al.
Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1988 Oct; 319(17): 1105-11.
Theroux P, Taeymans Y, Morissette D et al.
A randomized study comparing propranolol and diltiazem in the treatment of unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985 Mar; 5(3): 717-22.
Theroux P, Waters D, Qiu S et al.
Aspirin versus heparin to prevent myocardial infarction during the acute phase of unstable angina. Circulation 1993 Nov; 88(part 1): 2045-48.
TIMI IIIA Investigators.
Early effects of tissue-type plasmogen activator added to conventional therapy on the culprit coronary lesion in patients presenting with ischemic cardiac pain at rest. Circulation 1993 Jan; 87: 38-52.
TIMI IIIB Investigators.
Effects of tissue plasmogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave infarction: Results of the TIMI IIIB trial. Circulation, in press. Wallentin LC.
Aspirin (75 mg/day) after an episode of unstable coronary artery disease: long-term effects on the risk for myocardial infarction, occurrence of severe angina and the need for revascularization. Research Group on Instability in Coronary Artery Disease in Southeast Sweden. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991 Dec; 18(7): 1587-93.
Williams DO, Kirby MG, McPherson K et al.
Anticoagulant treatment of unstable angina. Br J Clin Prac 1986 Mar; 40(3): 114-6.
Yusuf S, Wittes J, Friedman L.
Overview of results of randomized clinical trials in heart disease. II. Unstable angina, heart failure, primary prevention with aspirin, and risk factor modification. JAMA 1988 Oct; 260(15): 2259-63.

Abstract

This Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians contains recommendations on the care of patients with unstable angina based on a combination of evidence obtained through extensive literature reviews and consensus among members of a private-sector, expert panel. Principal conclusions include:

This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission, except for those copyrighted materials noted for which further reproduction is prohibited without the specific permission of copyright holders.

AHCPR and NHLBI appreciate citation as to source, and the suggested format is as follows:

Braunwald E, Mark DB, Jones RH et al. Diagnosing and Managing Unstable Angina. Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians, Number 10. AHCPR Publication No. 94-0603. Rockville, MD. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. May 1994 (amended).

[Tables]

CCSC angina classification

Table 1. Likelihood of significant CAD in patients with symptoms suggesting unstable angina

Table 2. Short-term risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with symptoms suggesting unstable angina

Table 3. Drugs commonly used in intensive medical management of patients with unstable angina

Table 4. Implications of stress test results

[Figures]

Figure 1: Diagnosis and risk stratification

Figure 2: Noninvasive testing

Figure 3: Cardiac catheterization and myocardial revascularization